🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most recognizable pictures from the 20th century shows an unclothed child, her limbs outstretched, her face contorted in agony, her skin blistered and peeling. She appears fleeing towards the lens while escaping an airstrike within the Vietnam War. Nearby, other children also run out of the destroyed village in the region, with a background featuring black clouds and troops.

This International Impact from a Seminal Image

Shortly after its release in June 1972, this image—originally called The Terror of War—became an analog phenomenon. Seen and discussed globally, it is broadly credited for motivating worldwide views critical of the American involvement in Southeast Asia. One noted critic later commented that this profoundly indelible photograph featuring the child the girl in distress probably did more to heighten global outrage against the war compared to extensive footage of broadcast barbarities. An esteemed English war photographer who covered the war called it the most powerful image of what would later be called the televised conflict. Another experienced combat photographer remarked that the picture is in short, one of the most important images ever taken, specifically from that conflict.

A Long-Standing Claim and a New Claim

For over five decades, the photograph was assigned to the work of Nick Út, a young local photojournalist working for the Associated Press during the war. However a provocative recent investigation released by a global network claims that the famous image—long considered as the pinnacle of war journalism—may have been shot by a different man at the location in the village.

As presented in the film, The Terror of War was actually taken by a freelancer, who provided his photos to the AP. The claim, and its resulting investigation, originates with an individual called Carl Robinson, who alleges how the dominant photo chief instructed the staff to reassign the image’s credit from the original photographer to the staff photographer, the one employed photographer present at the time.

This Search to find the Truth

Robinson, now in his 80s, reached out to a filmmaker in 2022, requesting help in finding the unknown stringer. He stated how, if he was still living, he wished to offer an apology. The investigator thought of the freelance stringers he had met—comparing them to modern freelancers, similar to independent journalists at the time, are often marginalized. Their work is frequently doubted, and they work amid more challenging situations. They have no safety net, no long-term security, little backing, they frequently lack proper gear, and they are extremely at risk as they capture images within their homeland.

The investigator pondered: Imagine the experience to be the individual who captured this iconic picture, should it be true that he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it would be deeply distressing. As an observer of war photography, specifically the highly regarded documentation of Vietnam, it might be earth-shattering, maybe reputation-threatening. The revered history of "Napalm Girl" in Vietnamese-Americans is such that the director who had family fled during the war felt unsure to pursue the project. He stated, “I didn’t want to challenge this long-held narrative that credited Nick the photograph. I also feared to disturb the status quo among a group that always looked up to this achievement.”

This Investigation Progresses

Yet the two the journalist and the director felt: it was necessary raising the issue. When reporters are to keep the world accountable,” noted the journalist, “we have to be able to address tough issues within our profession.”

The film documents the team in their pursuit of their inquiry, from testimonies from observers, to call-outs in present-day the city, to reviewing records from related materials captured during the incident. Their search finally produce a name: a driver, employed by a television outlet that day who sometimes sold photographs to foreign agencies as a freelancer. In the film, an emotional Nghệ, like others advanced in age based in California, attests that he handed over the photograph to the news organization for minimal payment and a print, only to be plagued by not being acknowledged for decades.

The Reaction Followed by Additional Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the film, quiet and calm, but his story turned out to be controversial among the field of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to