🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.