🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I usually shied away from heavy use of luck during my D&D sessions. My preference was for the plot and session development to be guided by character actions as opposed to pure luck. Recently, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly glad I did.

The Spark: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A popular streamed game showcases a DM who often asks for "fate rolls" from the players. He does this by picking a polyhedral and outlining potential outcomes tied to the roll. This is fundamentally no distinct from using a random table, these are devised on the spot when a character's decision doesn't have a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own session, mostly because it appeared engaging and provided a break from my standard routine. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated dynamic between planning and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my group had just emerged from a massive battle. Later, a cleric character asked about two friendly NPCs—a pair—had survived. Instead of deciding myself, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a profoundly poignant moment where the characters discovered the remains of their companions, still clasped together in their final moments. The cleric conducted last rites, which was especially meaningful due to earlier roleplaying. As a parting reward, I chose that the forms were miraculously transformed, revealing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the group required to address another pressing story problem. One just script such magical moments.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This experience made me wonder if randomization and making it up are truly the essence of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Players frequently take delight in upending the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a good DM must be able to think quickly and invent details in real-time.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these skills without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The key is to apply them for small-scale circumstances that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. As an example, I would not employ it to decide if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. However, I might use it to determine whether the PCs enter a room moments before a key action unfolds.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also works to keep players engaged and foster the impression that the story is alive, shaping in reaction to their decisions as they play. It prevents the feeling that they are merely characters in a pre-written story, thereby strengthening the cooperative aspect of storytelling.

Randomization has long been part of the core of D&D. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Even though modern D&D tends to emphasizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Finding the Right Balance

Absolutely no problem with doing your prep. However, there is also no issue with stepping back and letting the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Direction is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We require it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final advice is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Experiment with a little chance for smaller details. You might just create that the surprising result is significantly more powerful than anything you would have planned by yourself.